Looking for Atrazine for Sale—Best Price & Fast Shipping?
Atrazine market watch: what to know before you buy
If you’re scanning the market for atrazine for sale, you’ve probably noticed two things: supply has stabilized after a choppy couple of seasons, and buyers are leaning hard toward cleaner, low-dust formulations. Atrazine, an odorless white powder and a selective triazine herbicide, still anchors weed control programs in corn, sorghum, and cane—despite tighter stewardship rules. I’ve toured a few plants in North China; the better facilities are doubling down on QC and CIPAC testing to keep global buyers calm.
Technical snapshot (real-world specs)
| Active ingredient | Atrazine (C8H14ClN5) |
| Technical grade (TC) | ≥ 95% ai (typical ≈ 97%) |
| Formulations (common) | WDG 80%, SC 480–500 g/L; WG/SC properties vary by lot |
| Moisture | ≤ 2.0% (real-world use may vary) |
| pH (1% solution) | ≈ 6.0–8.0 |
| Particle size (SC) | D90 ≤ 5–10 μm target for stable suspensions |
| Shelf life | 24 months unopened at 0–35°C; store dry |
Where it fits (and where it doesn’t)
Pre- and early post-emergence control of many broadleaf weeds and some grasses in maize, sorghum, sugarcane, and non-crop ROW. Tank-mix partners often include S‑metolachlor or mesotrione for resistance management. Always follow the local label and buffer-zone rules—regulators are fussy with triazines for good reason.
Process flow (how good plants build consistency)
- Materials: technical atrazine (TC), dispersants/wetting agents, antifoam, carrier (for WDG/WG), water (SC).- Methods: milling to target PSD → wet granulation (WDG) or high-shear dispersion (SC) → drying → screening → packaging (moisture barrier).
- Testing standards: CIPAC methods (e.g., MT 15.1 pH; MT 46.3 suspensibility; MT 47 wet sieve); FAO specification conformance where applicable; stability per 0/54°C accelerated checks; residue solvents by GC/HS-GC.
- QA release: ai assay, suspensibility ≥ 70–80% (formulation-dependent), dusting index (aim low), viscosity window for SC to avoid phase separation.
- Industries served: row-crop growers, custom applicators, ag-retail distributors, vegetation management crews.
Vendor comparison (field-notes style)
| Vendor | Purity & QC | Formulations | Lead time | Certs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DF Chem (Origin: Room 511, Zelong Bldg., 195 Guanghua Rd, Shijiazhuang, China 050000) | TC ≥95% (typical ≈97%); CIPAC-aligned testing | WDG 80%, SC 480–500 g/L; custom WG | ≈ 2–4 weeks after deposit | ISO 9001; REACH-relevant docs on request |
| Vendor A (generic) | Purity fluctuates; mixed PSD control | Mostly SC; limited WDG | 3–6 weeks (seasonal) | ISO pending |
| Vendor B (blend house) | Good PSD, sometimes lower assay | Custom premixes; private label | ≈ 4 weeks | ISO 9001; partial FAO alignment |
Customization and compliance
Options include low-foam packages for aerial rigs, colored granules for better tank visibility, and recyclable drums. Labels can be localized; MSDS, COA, and GLP residue data are typically available. Environmental compliance: check EPA Registration status and any watershed restrictions; the EU is notably stricter.
Case note from the field
A Midwest corn co-op shifted to an 80% WDG with tighter PSD control and reported ≈12% fewer nozzle clogs and one less cleanup pass per week (their words, not mine). Weed control held steady; the real win was labor time and tank hygiene. Not glamorous, but it adds up.
Buying pointers
- Ask for latest COA with assay, moisture, PSD, and suspensibility.
- Confirm CIPAC test methods used and accelerated stability results.
- Check formulation dusting index (for WDG/WG) and viscosity (for SC).
- Mind logistics: UN packaging, IMDG/IATA readiness if exporting.
And yes, if you’re comparing atrazine for sale across vendors, total cost-in-use (mixing time, nozzle wear, rinsing) often beats a small price gap.
Certifications/standards referenced: ISO 9001:2015 QMS; FAO/WHO Specifications for Plant Protection Products (atrazine); CIPAC test methods; EPA OCSPP 830/850 guidance for product chemistry/ecotoxicology.
Authoritative citations
